Kawasaki 750 Turbo

Kawasaki 750 Turbo

by classic-bike |
Published on
RICK RIDES

For a time in the 1980s, it looked like turbocharging was the future – and one bike soon blew the rest away. But was Kawasaki’s 750 Turbo a winner or just a load of hot air?

Words RICK PARKINGTON Photography GARY MARGERUM

Funny how minor styling details stick in your mind. If you’d asked me last week to name some mid-’80s Kawasakis, the 750 Turbo is the one I’d have forgotten. But I do remember liking the one with a funny row of studs, like bullet holes, along the side panel – and a guy who sauntered over for a look at this bike during my test said he’d recognised it by the alloy midriff to the fairing.

Well, that’s the 750 Turbo. But beyond its visual appeal, as I stood alongside the ZX750E – Kawasaki never called it a GPz – on loan from Earl Classics, I didn’t have very high hopes. I mean, turbos... really? To me, putting a turbo on a road bike was just marketing patter – aimed at older versions of the kid who stood at the counter asking me if we had a ‘power band’ in stock for his DT125. Honda had already made turbos a bit of a joke by charging their spinsterly CX500, while the Suzuki and Yamaha offerings were little more convincing. The GPz1100 was pretty damn good as I recall, so why would anyone buy a 750 with a built-in vacuum cleaner – however studded the side panels?

‘To me, putting a turbo on a road bike was just marketing patter – aimed at older versions of the kid who stood at the counter asking me if we had a ‘power band’ in stock’

Well, now I think I know. The Turbo is a surprisingly nice bike to ride. For a start, the slinky looks are practical – the contoured seat and tank combination make it narrow and provide the classic ‘sitting in, not on’ position which is a blessing for shorter-legged riders. I liked it too – although low seats can spell a cramped riding position for those of my height, again the Kawasaki scored with the relationship between seat, pegs and bars, encouraging me to adopt a near perfect back-straight position rather my usual lumbarcrunching slouch. On top of that, sitting in a bike always inspires cornering confidence and I felt immediately at home on the 750 – my only complaint being the stylish fairing mirrors that required me to bodyswerve like a rugby player to see behind my shoulders. But then, as my dad says: ‘You should know what’s behind, because you’ve just overtaken it,’ and that’s an area at which the Turbo excels.

The first I heard of the turbocharger was an odd jingling noise at 3000rpm, like a phone ringing in my pocket – this, I realised, was the beast stirring but not yet awake. Power was adequate while it slept – although on a long, steepish climb I might as well have been on a Z200 and noticed cars racking up embarrassingly behind me. Dropping a cog, I soon pulled away again – but you wouldn’t need to do that on a Bonneville. And again, later, when I tried to accelerate in fourth to pass a cyclist I’d been sitting behind, it almost felt like it was in ‘limp mode’. I tell you this not to expose my lazy British bike rider’s ways, but because it’s it’s not a slogger, you need to be in the right gear, and I liked the bike so much it didn’t annoy me. I blamed myself, mutely apologising and cogging down. But when the turbo kicks in... well, that jingling at 3000 may be the alarm clock ringing, but it has a long snooze setting. It’s not till 5000 that we get up and go – and then all hell breaks loose. It’s not exactly a ‘power band’ like that lad wanted for his DT – or if it is, I didn’t find the other side. It was more like riding a twin that’s been running on one cylinder and suddenly cuts to two. The power just seemed to keep coming faster and faster with no real indication of flattening off.

To read more, head into stores and grab the latest issue of Classic Bike, or why not check out our subscription options so you never miss an issue!

Just so you know, we may receive a commission or other compensation from the links on this website - read why you should trust us